WORLD MODELS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND PROSPECTS FOR ADAPTATION IN UKRAINE
Abstract
The article addresses the topical issue of implementing corporate social responsibility (CSR) within the framework of corporate governance across different world regions. The relevance of the study is determined by the growing role of CSR as a strategic management tool that goes beyond voluntary charitable initiatives and becomes an integral element of risk management, stakeholder engagement and long-term competitiveness. The purpose of the article is to conduct a comparative analysis of world CSR models and to identify the prospects for adapting international experience to the conditions of Ukraine. The study employs the methods of comparative analysis, systematisation and generalisation of scientific sources, as well as the analytical matrix approach for structuring the comparison of CSR models across key parameters. The research examines the American (Anglo-Saxon), British (European liberal), continental European (including the German-speaking and Scandinavian sub-models), Mediterranean, Central and Eastern European, and Asian models (Japan, South Korea, Singapore). The analysis is conducted according to unified criteria: the type of economic system, the role of the state, management orientation, the level of CSR integration into corporate strategy, non-financial reporting practices, the dominant focus and the level of institutional maturity. The results demonstrate that the American model is characterised by market-driven CSR initiatives with minimal state intervention, while the European models show a higher level of institutional regulation and stakeholder orientation. The Scandinavian model represents the most advanced form of CSR integration, combining state coordination with deep corporate culture of social responsibility. The Asian model combines state strategic guidance with cultural traditions of corporate discipline. The Central and Eastern European model is at the stage of institutional formation, developing primarily under the influence of EU regulatory requirements. The practical value of the study lies in identifying the key parameters that determine the effectiveness of CSR models and formulating recommendations for their adaptation to the Ukrainian context, taking into account the specifics of the transitional economy and European integration aspirations.
References
Охріменко О. О., Іванова Т. В. Соціальна відповідальність : навч. посіб. Київ : Національний технічний університет України “Київський політехнічний інститут”, 2015. 180 с.
Freeman R. E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston : Pitman, 1984. 276 p.
Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review. 2011. Vol. 89, No. 1-2. P. 62-77.
Hall P. A., Soskice D. (eds.). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2001. 540 p.
Vitols S. Varieties of Corporate Governance: Comparing Germany and the UK. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press, 2001. P. 337-360.
Саприкіна М. А., Ляшенко О., Саєнсус М. А. та ін. Корпоративна соціальна відповідальність: моделі та управлінська практика. Київ : ТОВ “Фарбований лист”, 2011. 480 с.
Грицина Л. А. Корпоративна соціальна відповідальність підприємств: зарубіжний та вітчизняний досвід. Вісник ЖДТУ. Серія: Економічні науки. 2016. № 2 (76). С. 168-173.
Мінц О. Ю., Камишникова Е. В. Імплементація міжнародних стандартів у формуванні корпоративної соціальної відповідальності на промислових підприємствах. Вісник Приазовського державного технічного університету. 2018. Вип. 35. С. 35-43.
OECD. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct. Paris : OECD Publishing, 2023. URL: https://www.oecd.org
Колодійчук В.А., Куртяк М.Б. Соціальні чинники забезпечення гнучкості виробничо-логістичних систем у корпоративному секторі зернового ринку. АГРОСВІТ. 2025. № 11. С. 101-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6792.2025.11.100
ISO 26000:2010. Guidance on Social Responsibility. International Organization for Standardization. Geneva : ISO, 2010.
United Nations Global Compact. Official website. URL: https://unglobalcompact.org
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). GRI Standards. URL: https://www.globalreporting.org
Carroll A. B., Shabana K. M. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2010. Vol. 12, Is. 1. P. 85-105.
European Commission. Directive 2014/95/EU on disclosure of non-financial and diversity information. Official Journal of the European Union. 2014.
Andersen T. M., Holmström B., Honkapohja S. et al. The Nordic Model: Embracing Globalization and Sharing Risks. Helsinki : Taloustieto Oy, 2007. 165 p.
Midttun A. Partnered governance: Aligning Corporate Responsibility and Public Policy in the Global Economy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. 2008. Vol. 8, Is. 4. P. 406-418.
Okhrimenko O. O., Ivanova T. V. (2015) Sotsialna vidpovidalnist [Social Responsibility]. Kyiv: National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”. 180 p.
Freeman R. E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman. 276 p.
Porter M. E., & Kramer M. R. (2011) Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, no. 89(1-2), pp. 62-77.
Hall P. A., & Soskice D. (Eds.) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 540 p.
Vitols S. (2001) Varieties of Corporate Governance: Comparing Germany and the UK. In: Hall P. A., Soskice D. (Eds.) Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford University Press, pp. 337-360.
Saprykina M. A., Liashenko O., Saiensus M. A. et al. (2011) Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist: modeli ta upravlinska praktyka [Corporate social responsibility: models and management practice]. Kyiv: TOV “Farbovanyi lyst”. 480 p.
Hrytsyna L. A. (2016) Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist pidpryiemstv: zarubizhnyi ta vitchyznianyi dosvid [Corporate social responsibility of enterprises: foreign and domestic experience]. Visnyk ZhDTU. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, no. 2(76), pp. 168–173.
Mints O. Yu., Kamyshnykova E. V. (2018) Implementatsiia mizhnarodnykh standartiv u formuvanni korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti na promyslovykh pidpryiemstvakh [Implementation of international standards in shaping corporate social responsibility at industrial enterprises]. Visnyk Pryazovskoho derzhavnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu, no. 35, pp. 35-43.
OECD (2023) OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd.org
Kolodiichuk V. A., & Kurtiak M. B. (2025) Sotsialni chynnyky zabezpechennia hnuchkosti vyrobnycho-lohistychnykh system u korporatyvnomu sektori zernovoho rynku [Social factors for ensuring the flexibility of production and logistics systems in the corporate sector of the grain market]. Agrosvit, no. 11, pp. 101–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6792.2025.11.100
ISO (2010) ISO 26000:2010. Guidance on Social Responsibility. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
United Nations Global Compact. Official website. Available at: https://unglobalcompact.org
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). GRI Standards. Available at: https://www.globalreporting.org
Carroll A. B., & Shabana K. M. (2010) The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, no. 12(1), pp. 85-105.
European Commission (2014) Directive 2014/95/EU on disclosure of non-financial and diversity information. Official Journal of the European Union.
Andersen T. M., Holmström B., Honkapohja S. et al. (2007) The Nordic Model: Embracing Globalization and Sharing Risks. Helsinki: Taloustieto Oy. 165 p.
Midttun A. (2008) Partnered governance: Aligning Corporate Responsibility and Public Policy in the Global Economy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, no. 8(4), pp. 406-418.
Copyright (c) 2026 М.Б. Куртяк

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

