THE PARADIGMATIC TRANSFORMATION: THE PATH FROM POST-WAR RECOVERY TO RECONSTRUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
The article substantiates the importance of a paradigm shift in the approach to Ukraine's restoration. This is related to the transition from the traditional approach to post-war recovery towards a strategy focused on reconstructive development. The study analyses internationally known post-conflict recovery practices and Ukrainian perspective on reconstruction. This includes the Marshall Plan, the Asian economic miracle, modern economic stabilization measures, and the model of reconstructive development. The investigation demonstrates a significant difference between international practices and the Ukrainian concept. It is emphasized that traditional reconstruction focuses primarily on the physical restoration of destroyed infrastructure and the achievement of macroeconomic stability. This approach involves a return to the pre-war state. However, in many countries, post-war recovery efforts are hampered by discrepancies between the implemented programmes and established institutions. In contrast, reconstructive development is characterized by a fundamental rebuilding of the economic system. This strategy focuses on structural reconstruction to achieve a qualitatively new level of economic stability and competitiveness of the national economy. The model is founded on three core principles: introversion, inclusiveness and innovation. The article highlights the features of each component. They contribute to the strengthening of the national system and respond to internal requirements. These principles address a range of issues, including internal challenges and external integration, social justice alongside economic efficiency, and industrial policy with innovative strategies. Therefore, the concept of reconstructive development can become the basis for Ukraine's post-war recovery, especially in view of its unique national characteristics. Further research is necessary to develop an effective mechanism for coordinating different vectors, which will contribute to balanced development.
References
Гриценко А. А. Економіко-інформаційний імператив нової статистичної парадигми : монографія / НАН України, ДУ «Інститут економіки та прогнозування НАН України». Київ, 2020. 436 с.
Гриценко А. А. Реконструктивний економічний розвиток: зміст, основні напрями і вектор соціальної справедливості. Економічна теорія. 2016. № 4. С. 5-18. URL: https://etet.org.ua/docs/ET_16_4_05_uk.pdf
Євроінтеграція України: проблеми, ризики, виклики. Український інститут майбутнього. 15.10.2025. URL: https://uifuture.org/publications/yevrointegracziya-ukrayiny-problemy-ryzyky-vyklyky/
Небрат В. В. Державна суб'єктність у реалізації національної програми економічної реконструкції Республіки Корея. Відбудова для розвитку: зарубіжний досвід та українські перспективи : міжнародна колективна монографія / редкол.: В. Небрат, А. Бєляк, О. Курбет та ін. ; НАН України, ДУ «Інститут економіки та прогнозування НАН України». Київ, 2023. C. 110-129.
Реконструктивний економічний розвиток: основні напрями, ефективність і соціальна справедливість : монографічний збірник / за ред. акад. НАН України Гейця В.М., чл.-кор. НАН України Гриценка А.А. ; НАН України, ДУ «Інститут економіки та прогнозування НАН України». Київ, 2016. 240 с.
Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity and poverty. New York : Crown Publishers, 2012. 529 p.
Bhattacharya R., Clements B., Gupta S., Alex Segura-Ubiergo, Tareq S. et al. Rebuilding Fiscal Institutions in Postconflict Countries. IMF. Washington, DC. 2005. 42 p. URL: https://www.elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9781589064492/ch01.xml
Crafts N. The Marshall Plan: A reality check. University of Warwick Working Paper Series. No. 49. 2011. 16 p.
De Long J. B., Eichengreen B. The Marshall Plan: history’s most successful structural adjustment program. Cambridge, MA : National Bureau of Economic Research. 1991. 64 p. URL: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w3899/w3899.pdf
Post-Conflict Economic Recovery: Enabling Local Ingenuity / ed. by Ohiorhenuan J. F. E. and Stewart F. UNDP, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery. New York : UNDP, 2008. 238 p. URL: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/tr/Post_Conflict_Economic_Recovery_Report.pdf
Post-Conflict Reconstruction: the Role of the World Bank. World Bank, Washington, DC. 1998. 69 p. URL: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/175771468198561613/pdf/multi-page.pdf
Sachs J. Understanding “shock Therapy”. Social Market Foundation. 1994. 44 p.
Williams A. J. «Reconstruction» before the Marshall Plan. Review of International Studies. 2005. Vol. 31. № 3. P. 541-558.
Hrytsenko A. A. (2020). Ekonomiko-informatsiinyi imperatyv novoi statystychnoi paradyhmy : monohrafiia [The economic and informational imperative of the new statistical paradigm: monograph]. Kyiv. 436 p. (in Ukrainian).
Hrytsenko, A. A. (2016). Rekonstruktyvnyi ekonomichnyi rozvytok: zmist, osnovni napriamy i vektor sotsialnoi spravedlyvosti [Reconstructive economic development: contents, guidelines and the vector of social justice]. Ekonomichna teoriia - Economic theory, vol. 4, pp. 5–18. Available at: https://etet.org.ua/docs/ET_16_4_05_uk.pdf
Ukrainskyi instytut maibutnoho. (2025). Ievrointehratsiia Ukrainy: problemy, ryzyky, vyklyky [Ukraine's European integration: problems, risks, challenges]. Available at: https://uifuture.org/publications/yevrointegracziya-ukrayiny-problemy-ryzyky-vyklyky/
Nebrat V. V. (2023). Derzhavna subiektnist u realizatsii natsionalnoi prohramy ekonomichnoi rekonstruktsii Respubliky Koreia. [State subjectivity in the implementation of the Republic of Korea's national economic reconstruction programme]. In V. Nebrat, A. Bieliak, O. Kurbet (Eds.). Vidbudova dlia rozvytku: zarubizhnyi dosvid ta ukrainski perspektyvy: mizhnarodna kolektyvna monohrafiia [Reconstruction for development: foreign experience and Ukrainian prospects: international collective monograph]. Kyiv. pp. 110-129. (in Ukrainian)
Heyets, V. M., Hrytsenko, A. A. (ed.) (2016). Rekonstruktyvnyi ekonomichnyi rozvytok: osnovni napriamy, efektyvnist i sotsialna spravedlyvist : monohrafichnyi zbirnyk [Reconstructive economic development: main directions, efficiency and social justice: monographic collection]. Kyiv. 240 p. (in Ukrainian).
Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. (2012) Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity and poverty. New York: Crown Publishers, 529 p.
Bhattacharya R., Clements B., Gupta S., Alex Segura-Ubiergo, Tareq S. et al. (2005) Rebuilding Fiscal Institutions in Postconflict Countries. IMF. Washington, DC. 42 p. Available at: https://www.elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9781589064492/ch01.xml
Crafts N. (2011) The Marshall Plan: A reality check. University of Warwick Working Paper Series. No. 49. 16 p.
De Long J. B., Eichengreen B. (1991) The Marshall Plan: history’s most successful structural adjustment program. National Bureau of Economic Research. 64 p. Available at: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w3899/w3899.pdf
Ohiorhenuan J. F. E., Stewart F. (eds.). (2008) Post-Conflict Economic Recovery: Enabling Local Ingenuity. New York: UNDP, 238 p. Available at: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/tr/Post_Conflict_Economic_Recovery_Report.pdf
World Bank. (1998) Post-Conflict Reconstruction: the Role of the World Bank. World Bank. Washington, DC. 69 p. Available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/175771468198561613/pdf/multi-page.pdf
Sachs J. (1994) Understanding “shock Therapy”. Social Market Foundation. 44 p.
Williams, A. J. (2005) «Reconstruction» before the Marshall Plan. Review of International Studies, vol. 31 (3), 541–558 pp.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ю.О. Мірясов, Т.М. Федченко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
